My Photo

My Other Accounts

Facebook LinkedIn Technorati

« Advanced Branding Masterclass Week Six - Customer Experience Design | Main | Have You Ordered Your Google Ring Yet? »

October 12, 2007

Ad Agency's Disruptive Future? Can The Old Dogs Survive It?

“Password to Marketers' Meeting: Digital” as reported in a headline today by Suznee Vranica of WSJ. Wonder how many marketers have those secret passwords? In this crazy business environment, marketing is ready to be reinvented. No one is sure to who is taking the lead to drive this change. I have some ideas. I am sure you do too.

As all big players gather for an annual conference in Arizona yesterday and today, the topic that dominated in the seminars and dinner parties is easily predictable to be “How marketers adapt to survive/prosper in the new digital world?” and “What are the new tricks required to play this game?”

According to the study by BAH with American Marketers Association which was released during the conference yesterday, "digital marketing still lags the shift in consumer behavior" prompted by the Internet. The findings indicate that while "8 in 10 Americans are now online" and spend as much time on the Web as on TV, most marketers allocate only 5%-10% of their ad budgets to digital media. Its conclusions reinforced perceptions that many marketers are struggling to figure out digital media. Many are looking for help and are not getting them.

Less than 24% of those polled considered their companies "digitally savvy," citing several issues, including "lack of experience in new media" and "dearth of digital talent," the report said. Some industries are further behind than others: Nearly half of the consumer-goods companies that participated in the study spend less than 5% of their marketing budgets on digital, whereas technology, travel and financial services allocated more of their ad dollars to digital media.

Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer is vocal about his desire to give Microsoft a bigger presence in advertising. "As I look out 4, 5, 6, 10 years from now, advertising will become 15, 20, 25% of Microsoft's business," he said recently during a speech in Paris. Ballmer was speaking today in Arizona and predicted that in 10 years everything you read you will read on a screen. “My parents will never get there” Ballmer asks, rhetorically. “You’re right. But your kids will get there in four years.” It’s very important that as soon as you assume that everything will be delivered digitally; all media, all advertising will have to take that into account. As for what Ballmer calls “personal authoring,” none of it will be separate from the consumption of produced media. All media will have interactivity, community. There will be so many new sources of media. The blogger of today, he predicts, will be, in a sense, just a footnote 5 to 10 years from now.

Other than threats from Microsoft, Google and Facebook, there are good reasons for big agencies to panic.  In the list of ad agencies top 20 agencies in 1980, of those top 20 agencies, 17 are now part of the four major holding companies. The four largest holding companies represent close to 85% of the advertising in the US. and 50% of the advertising in the world. The agencies that they owned benefited from a good financial discipline, low cost of capital and market power as a result of scale. Sir Martin Sorrell did a fantastic job creating a global advertising powerhouse. But the nature of the business is changing so much that everyone needs to take a fresh look at what’s going to happen next 5-10 years. As a result of the disruptive change brought about by Web 2.0 and Media 2.0, agencies failed to step up and provide true strategic value to the mix, other than low-cost advertising and media buying factories. There is a lot of truth when Bruce Nassbuam of Business Week wrote in July headlined "Are Big Ad Agencies So Clueless That Corporations Should Avoid Them?"

The next question is how are clients going to fill that vacuum? If they’re not getting strategy and they’re not getting innovation from their ad agencies or the holding companies, where do they go for help? I’ve heard from senior agency executives “We should be doing it,” but they’re generally not doing it, but many are honest to admit they don’t understand it. Ad agencies, direct marketing firms, CRM agencies are all doing a little here and there, but the structural problem is still –if you go to an ad agency, you’re going an ad and a slogan. You’re not going to get a full picture of what is going on with all these Web 2.0 or a strategy (marketing) to drive all marketing activities. Or you’re not going to get an Enterprise Level Digital Roadmap that fully aligns with your brand and marketing goals.

So there are 4 ways that the strategy is going to be developed for a client. One is that ad agencies quickly step up to the role and start delivering this for their clients (impossible). Two, and what’s probably most prominent right now, is the clients are doing these themselves with some consulting boutiques or smart individuals. The third way is outside management consultants are now coming into the business and help picked other agencies to execute the advertising and other tactical activities (happening). The challenge is many traditional strategy firms do not understand the digital space as well as the “experiential” elements of the strategy. There is also a lack of contextual understand of brands due to their strong emphasis in analytical thinking. The fourth way is to use interactive agencies which deeply understand the web culture and how technology works (some success). They lack the rigor of strategy firm and most of them carry too much website legacies. Most of these firms are 10-12 years old and they have created their own legacies.

The problem with the clients doing it is that the clients are as siloed as the agencies are. Within many of these larger organizations, there’s a problem of strategy ownership and coordination. It’s an orchestra of a lot of instruments all playing their own tune without having a conductor who knows what each instrument can add to a symphony and then develop a strategic plan to create a very successful outcome.

Agneedhelp

What about the future hold for advertising agencies? Well, let me share with you a few slides from my power point on the future of ad agencies (sorry cannot share the whole deck due to business confidentiality reasons). Here is some of the thinking and what I think will be the key trends that further push marketing to the edge (I wrote and posted this in June):

- Clients are questioning the current and future relevance of traditional media & ad agencies. Will large ad agencies ever are able to evolve “fast” enough to meet the needs of this fast changing technology-driven and network-enabled world of marketing? (A study by Sapient, “52% of CMO’s believe that traditional, large advertising agencies are ill-suited to meet online marketing needs.)

- The first generation of interactive shops will step up to help but have a vacuum on the upstream strategy. They are generally more nimble when it comes to experimentation but need to rebuild a strong strategy practice which is another challenge on its own.

- Holding companies will gradually apply pressure for agencies to downsize and re-invest their profits to buy interactive shops. The challenge is there is nothing left to buy. They would not attempt to retrain their agencies people as it costs too much and takes too long.

- Rather than waste money re-training traditional human capital and resources, one might predict lay-offs and downsizing. While holding companies “trim the fat” from decreasingly relevant non-digital media and account management groups, expect to see more digital specialty shop acquisitions. The common thinking is “you can’t teach an old dog new tricks” when it comes to ad agencies adapting to new media and change.

What are the new tricks (I first presented this in Jan this year)? Tell me if you think ad agencies can do this in the near future.

- Virtual Corporate Personality - For years, large corporations have been trying to act as big corporations and becoming more and more “faceless”. The need for organization to have a “humanized” face (or interface) and touch is becoming important. This is not just about executives’ blogging, it is about putting a face and brings this face into the virtual world. I have been thinking a lot of about this and I have some interesting ideas.

- Private Search Network - The personal media revolution results in exponential increase in the amount of consumer generated content.  This leads users to search beyond the algorithm for new ways of searching what they need beyond just text and images. A method for this is collaborated social search, where people are sorting content on the web, creating their own groupings and sharing that with others. As a result of that you get Private Search Network which you need to be a member or be invited to get access. Marketers may have to pay to get access to these groups.

- Widget Everywhere Marketing - Widgets will becoming a new marketing tool as it is an effective way to add value and be able to link it to some marketing messages or simply create a service. As more and more new technologies will allow open participation for anyone who wants to create a widget. (Facebook is taking that approach and many will do the same)

- Automated Tagging – One day almost everything will be tagged and tagging will become more sophisticated. It will extend into products and services and even customer testimonials. Or even product origins or usage etc. The task of tagging will be automated and that will create a new level of challenge and opportunities for any search engine.

- Social Media Optimization - SMO is slowly evolving into a movement in the online world.  Primarily being driven initially by those search marketing folks, I think SMO will continue to get broader use from marketers interested in building traffic as well as buzz. Optimization and measurement will come hand-in-hand.

Anton Levy, managing director of General Atlantic LLC's media and consumer practice, believes that digital marketing is still a "high-growth category" compared with marketing on traditional media, "I think a couple of things. One is the secular trends in the overall marketing-services marketplace are particularly attractive for growth investors like ourselves...You have got this massive shift that you are seeing where all consumable media is trending towards digital environments and the huge ad dollars that are going to follow that audience. That large secular trend is creating a lot of different things. It's creating new business models, current companies are trying to adjust their existing business models and a massive amount of people and talent are being attracted to the space. That's why his firm invested (rumored to be) $200mm in buying AKQA (2X revenue). They put the money into where the mouth is.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8351b44f853ef00e54f0ac94a8834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Ad Agency's Disruptive Future? Can The Old Dogs Survive It?:

» Digital vs Advertising from iain tait | crackunit.com
I did my talk about 10 Reasons that Digital is Better than Advertising again the other day. I enjoyed it, and I did feel that bits of it are true. But at the same time it also felt a bit futile, It was never designed to be an important p... [Read More]

Comments

My Slides Space

AddThis Social Bookmark Button